<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Withoutabox &#038; Unbox</title>
	<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/</link>
	<description>Tells you what makes names tick.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 02:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce P. Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/#comment-44286</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce P. Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 04:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/#comment-44286</guid>
		<description>I find that "withoutabox" invokes a feeling of opposition to "withinabox" (as well as all those things you pointed out.  I too really like the withoutabox name.

Makes me wonder if there aren't a bunch of indian doamins like http://with.in and http://here.in and http://there.in just waiting to be registered.

Oops, looks like I'm late to that party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that &#8220;withoutabox&#8221; invokes a feeling of opposition to &#8220;withinabox&#8221; (as well as all those things you pointed out.  I too really like the withoutabox name.</p>
<p>Makes me wonder if there aren&#8217;t a bunch of indian doamins like <a href="http://with.in" rel="nofollow">http://with.in</a> and <a href="http://here.in" rel="nofollow">http://here.in</a> and <a href="http://there.in" rel="nofollow">http://there.in</a> just waiting to be registered.</p>
<p>Oops, looks like I&#8217;m late to that party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raj</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/#comment-43331</link>
		<dc:creator>raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 12:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/#comment-43331</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Iam looking a name for my start-up. It works on wireless telecom domain. Can u help me out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Iam looking a name for my start-up. It works on wireless telecom domain. Can u help me out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cinnamon</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/#comment-33267</link>
		<dc:creator>Cinnamon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 04:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/#comment-33267</guid>
		<description>hi,

my guess is that the noun interpretation comes to mind partly because of the stress pattern: I read "Unbox" with stress on the first syllable, so it doesn't really fit the pattern of uncage or unwrap. Maybe the word "inbox" is exerting some analogical influence here, as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,</p>
<p>my guess is that the noun interpretation comes to mind partly because of the stress pattern: I read &#8220;Unbox&#8221; with stress on the first syllable, so it doesn&#8217;t really fit the pattern of uncage or unwrap. Maybe the word &#8220;inbox&#8221; is exerting some analogical influence here, as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Name Inspector</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/#comment-29453</link>
		<dc:creator>The Name Inspector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 04:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/#comment-29453</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment, DevonTT. Yeah, I considered discussing the noun interpretation, but decided I was being unduly influenced by that same old ad campaign. Maybe it still has more resonance than I thought!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, DevonTT. Yeah, I considered discussing the noun interpretation, but decided I was being unduly influenced by that same old ad campaign. Maybe it still has more resonance than I thought!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DevonTT</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/#comment-29450</link>
		<dc:creator>DevonTT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 03:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/#comment-29450</guid>
		<description>Interesting analysis.  Thank you.

It's funny--my first impression of Unbox was that it was a noun.  Maybe I'm still being influenced by 7Up's "Uncola" campaign from the 70's...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting analysis.  Thank you.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny&#8211;my first impression of Unbox was that it was a noun.  Maybe I&#8217;m still being influenced by 7Up&#8217;s &#8220;Uncola&#8221; campaign from the 70&#8217;s&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
