<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Withoutabox &amp; Unbox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/</link>
	<description>Tells you what makes names tick.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:36:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: niles</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/comment-page-1/#comment-121522</link>
		<dc:creator>niles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/#comment-121522</guid>
		<description>Something like &quot;Notbox&quot; would be easier to pronounce than Unbox. Maybe it&#039;s the &quot;nnnb&quot; in the middle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something like &#8220;Notbox&#8221; would be easier to pronounce than Unbox. Maybe it&#8217;s the &#8220;nnnb&#8221; in the middle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce P. Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/comment-page-1/#comment-44286</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce P. Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 04:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/#comment-44286</guid>
		<description>I find that &quot;withoutabox&quot; invokes a feeling of opposition to &quot;withinabox&quot; (as well as all those things you pointed out.  I too really like the withoutabox name.

Makes me wonder if there aren&#039;t a bunch of indian doamins like http://with.in and http://here.in and http://there.in just waiting to be registered.

Oops, looks like I&#039;m late to that party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that &#8220;withoutabox&#8221; invokes a feeling of opposition to &#8220;withinabox&#8221; (as well as all those things you pointed out.  I too really like the withoutabox name.</p>
<p>Makes me wonder if there aren&#8217;t a bunch of indian doamins like <a href="http://with.in" rel="nofollow">http://with.in</a> and <a href="http://here.in" rel="nofollow">http://here.in</a> and <a href="http://there.in" rel="nofollow">http://there.in</a> just waiting to be registered.</p>
<p>Oops, looks like I&#8217;m late to that party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raj</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/comment-page-1/#comment-43331</link>
		<dc:creator>raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 12:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/#comment-43331</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Iam looking a name for my start-up. It works on wireless telecom domain. Can u help me out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Iam looking a name for my start-up. It works on wireless telecom domain. Can u help me out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cinnamon</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/comment-page-1/#comment-33267</link>
		<dc:creator>Cinnamon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 04:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/#comment-33267</guid>
		<description>hi,

my guess is that the noun interpretation comes to mind partly because of the stress pattern: I read &quot;Unbox&quot; with stress on the first syllable, so it doesn&#039;t really fit the pattern of uncage or unwrap. Maybe the word &quot;inbox&quot; is exerting some analogical influence here, as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,</p>
<p>my guess is that the noun interpretation comes to mind partly because of the stress pattern: I read &#8220;Unbox&#8221; with stress on the first syllable, so it doesn&#8217;t really fit the pattern of uncage or unwrap. Maybe the word &#8220;inbox&#8221; is exerting some analogical influence here, as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Name Inspector</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/comment-page-1/#comment-29453</link>
		<dc:creator>The Name Inspector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 04:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/#comment-29453</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment, DevonTT. Yeah, I considered discussing the noun interpretation, but decided I was being unduly influenced by that same old ad campaign. Maybe it still has more resonance than I thought!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, DevonTT. Yeah, I considered discussing the noun interpretation, but decided I was being unduly influenced by that same old ad campaign. Maybe it still has more resonance than I thought!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DevonTT</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/comment-page-1/#comment-29450</link>
		<dc:creator>DevonTT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 03:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenameinspector.com/withoutabox-unbox/#comment-29450</guid>
		<description>Interesting analysis.  Thank you.

It&#039;s funny--my first impression of Unbox was that it was a noun.  Maybe I&#039;m still being influenced by 7Up&#039;s &quot;Uncola&quot; campaign from the 70&#039;s...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting analysis.  Thank you.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny&#8211;my first impression of Unbox was that it was a noun.  Maybe I&#8217;m still being influenced by 7Up&#8217;s &#8220;Uncola&#8221; campaign from the 70&#8217;s&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
