<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mini-post: Thoof</title>
	<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/thoof/</link>
	<description>Tells you what makes names tick.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nikos Bilalis</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/thoof/#comment-65288</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikos Bilalis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thenameinspector.com/thoof/#comment-65288</guid>
		<description>Unsurprisingly, Thoof didn't last long, after all.

http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/02/another-personalized-news-site-bites-the-dust/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unsurprisingly, Thoof didn&#8217;t last long, after all.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/02/another-personalized-news-site-bites-the-dust/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/02/another-personalized-news-site-bites-the-dust/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/thoof/#comment-43609</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thenameinspector.com/thoof/#comment-43609</guid>
		<description>It sounds decidedly stupid...somewhere between "thud" and "oof". Awful for a news site!

On a side note, I love your site (just discovered it through my favorite gum, Watering Kissmint, which is why I'm remarking on this oldfaced post). I thought it would just be a bunch of funny names at first, but the grammatical comments grew on me. It's interesting how little most of us think about sounds and words until someone makes us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds decidedly stupid&#8230;somewhere between &#8220;thud&#8221; and &#8220;oof&#8221;. Awful for a news site!</p>
<p>On a side note, I love your site (just discovered it through my favorite gum, Watering Kissmint, which is why I&#8217;m remarking on this oldfaced post). I thought it would just be a bunch of funny names at first, but the grammatical comments grew on me. It&#8217;s interesting how little most of us think about sounds and words until someone makes us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Name Inspector</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/thoof/#comment-8096</link>
		<dc:creator>The Name Inspector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thenameinspector.com/thoof/#comment-8096</guid>
		<description>Right, back, not front. I meant I couldn't think of anything else that has the combination in word-initial position. I just think the fact that the combination is so unusual is part of what makes it strange to some people. Even if a sound sequence exists in English, like the the final consonant combination in the word "sixth", it might still seem strange and/or difficult to say, especially if it's rare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, back, not front. I meant I couldn&#8217;t think of anything else that has the combination in word-initial position. I just think the fact that the combination is so unusual is part of what makes it strange to some people. Even if a sound sequence exists in English, like the the final consonant combination in the word &#8220;sixth&#8221;, it might still seem strange and/or difficult to say, especially if it&#8217;s rare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/thoof/#comment-8095</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thenameinspector.com/thoof/#comment-8095</guid>
		<description>What about "enthusiasm". It's just an accident that we don't have the word "thoof". Old English had þóðer "ball", which, if it had survived, would have turned into a word with theta + high back rounded vowel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about &#8220;enthusiasm&#8221;. It&#8217;s just an accident that we don&#8217;t have the word &#8220;thoof&#8221;. Old English had þóðer &#8220;ball&#8221;, which, if it had survived, would have turned into a word with theta + high back rounded vowel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Name Inspector</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/thoof/#comment-8063</link>
		<dc:creator>The Name Inspector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thenameinspector.com/thoof/#comment-8063</guid>
		<description>John, thanks for your comment. I'm not sure the name breaks any "rules", but I can't think of any other word in my variety of English that has the theta followed by the high front rounded vowel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, thanks for your comment. I&#8217;m not sure the name breaks any &#8220;rules&#8221;, but I can&#8217;t think of any other word in my variety of English that has the theta followed by the high front rounded vowel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/thoof/#comment-8062</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thenameinspector.com/thoof/#comment-8062</guid>
		<description>As I said on Nancy's blog, I don't see how it is phonetically counterintuitive. It doesn't break any rules. It's an accidental gap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said on Nancy&#8217;s blog, I don&#8217;t see how it is phonetically counterintuitive. It doesn&#8217;t break any rules. It&#8217;s an accidental gap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
