<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Name visualization: The phonetic name list</title>
	<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/name-visualization/</link>
	<description>Tells you what makes names tick.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Xavier</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/name-visualization/#comment-4008</link>
		<dc:creator>John Xavier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thenameinspector.com/name-visualization/#comment-4008</guid>
		<description>Examining the phonetic representations of names is definitely an interesting topic.  Great idea with the sonority representations, makes it easy to tell which sounds are the "harder" ones.

I'm pretty much familiar with phonetic transcriptions, There was only one symbol I haven't seen before: it's the schwa with the hook (ɚ) but it was easy to figure out (the "er" sound).

Pretty much all textbooks on phonetics seemed to use symbols that differed from IPA though (especially for the diphthongs).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Examining the phonetic representations of names is definitely an interesting topic.  Great idea with the sonority representations, makes it easy to tell which sounds are the &#8220;harder&#8221; ones.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty much familiar with phonetic transcriptions, There was only one symbol I haven&#8217;t seen before: it&#8217;s the schwa with the hook (ɚ) but it was easy to figure out (the &#8220;er&#8221; sound).</p>
<p>Pretty much all textbooks on phonetics seemed to use symbols that differed from IPA though (especially for the diphthongs).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
