<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flickr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenameinspector.com/flickr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/flickr/</link>
	<description>Tells you what makes names tick.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:19:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thghts On Ppsi&#8217;s Rbrndng &#171; You Have To Be Kidding</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/flickr/comment-page-1/#comment-112924</link>
		<dc:creator>Thghts On Ppsi&#8217;s Rbrndng &#171; You Have To Be Kidding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 07:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenameinspector.com/flickr/#comment-112924</guid>
		<description>[...] such misspellings are quite common in Web 2.0, it seems to work less well with more mainstream, not-tech brands. Check out the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] such misspellings are quite common in Web 2.0, it seems to work less well with more mainstream, not-tech brands. Check out the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why &#8220;theMaykazine?&#8221; &#171; theMaykazine</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/flickr/comment-page-1/#comment-42996</link>
		<dc:creator>Why &#8220;theMaykazine?&#8221; &#171; theMaykazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 03:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenameinspector.com/flickr/#comment-42996</guid>
		<description>[...] of any meme on the Internet, was the defining age of when I came into my first job. It&#8217;s very Flickr, and I like Flickr, so why not? Also, when writing titles into essays or articles, I always get [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of any meme on the Internet, was the defining age of when I came into my first job. It&#8217;s very Flickr, and I like Flickr, so why not? Also, when writing titles into essays or articles, I always get [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DevonTT</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/flickr/comment-page-1/#comment-29456</link>
		<dc:creator>DevonTT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 05:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenameinspector.com/flickr/#comment-29456</guid>
		<description>For the longest time, that &quot;loves you&quot; said &quot;beta&quot;. 

I agree that &quot;loves you&quot; sounds a bit sappy, but as a long-time pro subscriber, I&#039;m glad to see that I&#039;m no longer sinking money into a beta product!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the longest time, that &#8220;loves you&#8221; said &#8220;beta&#8221;. </p>
<p>I agree that &#8220;loves you&#8221; sounds a bit sappy, but as a long-time pro subscriber, I&#8217;m glad to see that I&#8217;m no longer sinking money into a beta product!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domenica Genovese</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/flickr/comment-page-1/#comment-27253</link>
		<dc:creator>Domenica Genovese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenameinspector.com/flickr/#comment-27253</guid>
		<description>I like Flickr, too, and have wondered about the name choice. Thanks, your article has -er- shed light on the subject. I recently noticed the words &quot;loves you&quot; in gray type above the Flickr logo. So it now reads, &quot;Flickr loves you.&quot; I find that irritating and cloying. A mistake, in my view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Flickr, too, and have wondered about the name choice. Thanks, your article has -er- shed light on the subject. I recently noticed the words &#8220;loves you&#8221; in gray type above the Flickr logo. So it now reads, &#8220;Flickr loves you.&#8221; I find that irritating and cloying. A mistake, in my view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weave</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/flickr/comment-page-1/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Weave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 06:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenameinspector.com/flickr/#comment-539</guid>
		<description>&quot;Flicking off&quot;?!? Like,
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/5/7757363_9394d91259_o.gif
?  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Flicking off&#8221;?!? Like,<br />
<a href="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/5/7757363_9394d91259_o.gif" rel="nofollow">http://farm1.static.flickr.com/5/7757363_9394d91259_o.gif</a><br />
?  <img src='http://www.thenameinspector.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Labossiere</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/flickr/comment-page-1/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Labossiere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 14:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenameinspector.com/flickr/#comment-444</guid>
		<description>I like flickr too, both the name and the service. I like the no-vowels form of abbreviation, tho if they had used that rule alone, well, flkr, looks almost obscene. Flick rhymes with pic, which is nice and it doesn&#039;t seem to matter at all that a flick is a movie rather than a still image. It also refers to the action of casual throwing off, flicking. Like you can flick your photos into your archive as easily as flicking a ladybug off your shoulder. What I don&#039;t like so much about flickr is that as soon as you need more than three categories to keep your pics organized, you have to pay an annual fee. It&#039;s not much but I resent the &quot;fee for upgrade&quot; business model; it irks me the way it kind of creeps up on you, depending on you getting &quot;into&quot; the service first, like a drug. Perhaps it should be called fl irk r. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like flickr too, both the name and the service. I like the no-vowels form of abbreviation, tho if they had used that rule alone, well, flkr, looks almost obscene. Flick rhymes with pic, which is nice and it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter at all that a flick is a movie rather than a still image. It also refers to the action of casual throwing off, flicking. Like you can flick your photos into your archive as easily as flicking a ladybug off your shoulder. What I don&#8217;t like so much about flickr is that as soon as you need more than three categories to keep your pics organized, you have to pay an annual fee. It&#8217;s not much but I resent the &#8220;fee for upgrade&#8221; business model; it irks me the way it kind of creeps up on you, depending on you getting &#8220;into&#8221; the service first, like a drug. Perhaps it should be called fl irk r. <img src='http://www.thenameinspector.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
