<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Name Inspector &#187; Phonology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenameinspector.com/category/phonology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com</link>
	<description>Tells you what makes names tick.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:17:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How to misspell a word</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/how-to-misspell-a-word/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thenameinspector.com/how-to-misspell-a-word/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Name Inspector</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Orthography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phonology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenameinspector.com/?p=930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t be misled by the title of this post: The Name Inspector has not started outsourcing his content to Demand Media. He simply felt that he had to find a way to acknowledge National Grammar Day, founded to promote good grammar and observed just this past Friday. But given his misgivings about pop prescriptivism and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t be misled by the title of this post: The Name Inspector has <em>not</em> started outsourcing his content to <a href="http://www.demandmedia.com/properties/ehow/">Demand Media</a>. He simply felt that he had to find a way to acknowledge <a href="http://grammatically.blogspot.com/2011/03/happy-national-grammar-day.html">National Grammar Day</a>, founded to promote good grammar and observed just this past Friday. But given his misgivings about pop prescriptivism and the monopoly it has on the public&#8217;s linguistic imagination, he couldn&#8217;t simply <em>celebrate</em> National Grammar Day. (And that&#8217;s not because he doesn&#8217;t love grammar. No one loves grammar more than The Name Inspector does.) So, as a response to National Grammar Day, respectfully postponed until after the fact, here&#8217;s a topic about breaking the rules: how to misspell a word.</p>
<p>Misspelling&#8211;let&#8217;s call it &#8220;creative&#8221; spelling to put a less negative spin on it&#8211;is a mainstay of consumer brand names from <strong>Cheez Whiz</strong> to <strong>Flickr</strong>. Doing it right requires careful attention to <a href="http://amzn.com/0393077403">microstyle</a>.</p>
<p>An important principle of microstyle, and one that applies to spelling, is expressive economy. That means getting the most meaning out of the least message.  Applied to spelling, expressive economy means not using more letters than you have to. If you&#8217;re going to misspell a word, you might as well make it more compact, right? Typically, yes. <strong>Cheez Whiz</strong> and <strong>Flickr</strong> both do well with expressive economy, and they&#8217;re quite memorable. Names that don&#8217;t observe the principle, like <strong>Brandtology</strong> (are we supposed to pronounce that <em>t</em>?) and  <strong>Bountii</strong>, often look clunky and confusing. Perhaps more importantly, since the extra letters aren&#8217;t motivated by the pronunciation, it&#8217;s hard to recover the spelling from the sound, and that makes the spelling much harder to remember.</p>
<p>It is possible to add letters to a word in a cute way. The name <strong>Digg</strong> comes to mind: the double &#8220;gg&#8221; on the end can&#8217;t help but remind you of the adorable word <em>egg</em>. And that tells us something important about extra letters: when they work, there&#8217;s usually a reason for them to be there, however subtle. <strong>Automattic</strong> is a good name for <a href="http://automattic.com">a company started by a guy named Matt</a>, for example.</p>
<p>Some names push expressive economy to the limit, eliminating letters that can&#8217;t be unambiguously recovered. The defunct url-shortening service <strong>br.st</strong>, for example, should probably be pronounced like the word <em>burst</em>, which sort of turns the r into a vowel. But can we be certain it&#8217;s not based on the word <em>breast</em>? And how about <strong>gdgt</strong>, for a tech review site. It&#8217;s based on the word <em>gadget</em>, but outside a tech context it might be hard to see that.</p>
<p>Balance also plays an important role in creative spelling. Correct spelling has plenty of redundancy in it. If you simplify spelling in some parts of a word while leaving other parts noticeably redundant, the result seems like a job half done. Take <strong>Clikthrough</strong>, for example. Since they&#8217;ve gone to the trouble of simplifying <em>click</em> to <em>clik</em>, why not streamline the cumbersome word <em>through</em>, which uses seven letters to express three sounds? <strong>Clikthru</strong> would be much better. Maybe the owner of the parked domain clikthru.com wouldn&#8217;t part with it, at least not for a reasonable price.</p>
<p>So, in the wake National Grammar Day, when we&#8217;re supposed to remember to do things right, let&#8217;s also remember that there&#8217;s a right way to do things wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thenameinspector.com/how-to-misspell-a-word/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phonotactics be damned!</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/phonotactics-be-damned/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thenameinspector.com/phonotactics-be-damned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Name Inspector</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Word Names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phonology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phonotactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pronunciation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenameinspector.com/phonotactics-be-damned/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suppose you want to write a computer program to look for unregistered domain names. You could devise a simple algorithm to produce all possible combinations of four letters, five letters, six letters, etc. But that would give you a whole mess of unpronounceable domains, like alsdh.com. So, you might want to strategize a little. You [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suppose you want to write a computer program to look for unregistered domain names. You could devise a simple algorithm to produce all possible combinations of four letters, five letters, six letters, etc. But that would give you a whole mess of unpronounceable domains, like alsdh.com. So, you might want to strategize a little. You could think about how English syllables are structured, and the possible ways to begin and end a syllable. The letters &#8220;lsdh&#8221; do not make a possible syllable ending, for example.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s <em>phonotactics</em>&#8211;the study of sound sequences that do and do not occur in a given language.  Some non-occurring sound sequences are simply unpronounceable and are not found in any language. Others are pronounceable but just don&#8217;t fit the idiosyncratic preferences of a particular language.</p>
<p>Lately The Name Inspector has noticed a bunch of names used in English-speaking contexts that don&#8217;t toe the line of normal English phonotactics. He suspects this is a new strategy for creating short names that are available as .com domains.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really common for names to mess with orthography. That strategy is typical of Web 2.0 names (<strong>Flickr</strong>, <strong>Digg</strong>, <strong>Zooomr</strong>, etc.) and has been with us for a long time (<strong>Cheez Whiz</strong>). But phonology has been pretty sacred until now. While all the following names are pronounceable, they start with sound sequences that don&#8217;t occur syllable-initially in English, except in some borrowed words.</p>
<p><strong>Zlio</strong>. This website allows you to instantly create an online affiliate store. It was in the news a while back because it got banned from Amazon.com. In English, the sequence zl- only occurs in the word <em>zloty</em>, the Polish currency unit.</p>
<p><strong>Vlingo</strong>.  This is a voice-to-text application for mobile devices. We English speakers see vl-at the beginning of a word only in the name <em>Vladimir </em>and in a tiny handful of obscure borrowed words.</p>
<p><strong>Jwaala</strong>. An online banking tool. This name is based on a Sanskrit-derived word for &#8216;fire&#8217;. English has plenty of words in which j- is followed by the vowel -u- (e.g. <em>juvenile</em>), but none in which it&#8217;s followed by the related consonant -w-.</p>
<p><strong>Srixon</strong>. The name of this golf ball manufacturer has a beginning that English speakers only find in the place name <em>Sri Lanka</em>.</p>
<p>How much farther can the phonological sensibilities of English speakers be pushed? As names become increasingly scarce, let&#8217;s wait and see.</p>
<p><small>Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/zlio" rel="tag">zlio</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/the+name+zlio" rel="tag"> the name zlio</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/vlingo" rel="tag"> vlingo</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/the+name+vlingo" rel="tag"> the name vlingo</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/jwaala" rel="tag"> jwaala</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/the+name+jwaala" rel="tag"> the name jwaala</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/srixon" rel="tag"> srixon</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/the+name+srixon" rel="tag"> the name srixon</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thenameinspector.com/phonotactics-be-damned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

