<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Awkwordplay: Just because you can doesn&#8217;t mean you should</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenameinspector.com/awkwordplay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/awkwordplay/</link>
	<description>Tells you what makes names tick.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:54:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bermuda Web Design</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/awkwordplay/comment-page-1/#comment-130818</link>
		<dc:creator>Bermuda Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenameinspector.com/awkwordplay/#comment-130818</guid>
		<description>I actually think teensurance is pretty damn good.  It is obviously copied from esurance but I like it.  It works well and clearly conveys what it is, without any thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually think teensurance is pretty damn good.  It is obviously copied from esurance but I like it.  It works well and clearly conveys what it is, without any thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Name Inspector</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/awkwordplay/comment-page-1/#comment-117378</link>
		<dc:creator>The Name Inspector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 19:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenameinspector.com/awkwordplay/#comment-117378</guid>
		<description>Hi Steffen,

Thanks for your comment. You know, I actually like the idea that de-emphasizing the word &quot;car&quot; in the name represents a reduced emphasis on cars in daily life. It&#039;s pretty cool sound symbolism. But it&#039;s really subtle, and I still think people who encounter the name for the first time will feel that tension between wanting and not wanting to emphasize the first syllable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steffen,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment. You know, I actually like the idea that de-emphasizing the word &#8220;car&#8221; in the name represents a reduced emphasis on cars in daily life. It&#8217;s pretty cool sound symbolism. But it&#8217;s really subtle, and I still think people who encounter the name for the first time will feel that tension between wanting and not wanting to emphasize the first syllable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steffen Frost</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/awkwordplay/comment-page-1/#comment-117377</link>
		<dc:creator>Steffen Frost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 19:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenameinspector.com/awkwordplay/#comment-117377</guid>
		<description>Hi Nameinspector,

Wanted to make a comment about carticipate being awkwordplay.

We do not emphasize &quot;car&quot; in carticipate nor do we think it should.  The intent is to create a new verb with a subtle change in spelling which shares all the inflected forms of participate, ie carticipation, carticipating, etc... to denote sharing of a ride by the &quot;carticipants&quot; or &quot;carticipators&quot;.

The pronunciation is the same which makes carticipate more a play on words rather than awkwardplay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nameinspector,</p>
<p>Wanted to make a comment about carticipate being awkwordplay.</p>
<p>We do not emphasize &#8220;car&#8221; in carticipate nor do we think it should.  The intent is to create a new verb with a subtle change in spelling which shares all the inflected forms of participate, ie carticipation, carticipating, etc&#8230; to denote sharing of a ride by the &#8220;carticipants&#8221; or &#8220;carticipators&#8221;.</p>
<p>The pronunciation is the same which makes carticipate more a play on words rather than awkwardplay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikos Bilalis</title>
		<link>http://www.thenameinspector.com/awkwordplay/comment-page-1/#comment-104819</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikos Bilalis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenameinspector.com/awkwordplay/#comment-104819</guid>
		<description>This was a very educational post for me. I had no idea. Thank you so much for the insight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a very educational post for me. I had no idea. Thank you so much for the insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

